Erker, Norton, Hare & Angles, L.L.C., Law Offices in Kansas & MissouriAttorneys at LawKansas & Missouri Lawyers
Erker, Norton, Hare & Angles, L.L.C., Law Offices in Kansas & MissouriKansas City LawyersKansas City AttorneysKansas City Lawyers
Erker, Norton, Hare & Angles, L.L.C. Home PageProfiles of our LawyersDUI DWI Traffic DefenseCriminal Defense LawyersDivorce & Domestic AttorneysPersonal Injury and Medical Malpractice AttorneysContact our Kansas & Missouri Law Offices
Kansas DUI LawyersKansas DUI Defense: Kansas City DUI Lawyers


Kansas DUI & Administrative Driver's License Suspension

As discussed previously, there are two separate proceedings initiated when a person is cited for a DUI in Kansas. At the same time that a person is being prosecuted criminally, a civil administrative suit is brought by the Kansas Department of Revenue against his or her driver's license. Neither case has any bearing on the other.

Free Evaluation Concerning Your Kansas DUI or Missouri DWI Defense

After a person has been read the implied consent notice, been tested, or refused the test, the police officer will keep his or her plastic driver's license. He must serve the person with a pink form that has been properly filled out by the officer. This form, titled “Officer’s Certification and Notice of Suspension, but commonly called a DC-27, will serve as the person's driver's license during the pendency of the administrative suit.

On the pink form, in the fine print, are instructions informing drivers that they must make a written request for a hearing concerning their driving privileges within 10 days. If the driver fails to make a written request within the 10 day limit, or doesn't make the request properly, his license will be automatically suspended by the Department of Revenue. If the driver, or his attorney, does request a hearing, the driver will be given what is called an Administrative Hearing. This hearing will be conducted by telephone unless the driver or his attorney requests a face to face hearing. The request must also request that the certifying officer(s) be subpoenaed to the hearing.

American Due Process provides that before the government can take away your property, you must be given an administrative hearing to determine whether that taking is lawful. Of course, you have to make a request for that hearing to get one. When the Department of Revenue receives this request, they will send notice to the driver and/or his attorney that they have received it. The driver's privileges will be extended until the date of the hearing. About three to six weeks after the request is mailed in, the driver and/or his attorney will receive notice of the hearing date and time. The hearing date is chosen by the Department and generally cannot be changed, moved or continued. The Department will also subpoena the arresting officer to be present for the hearing if you request that it do so.

The Kansas Department of Revenue will issue an order requiring that any video or audio tapes be provided by the police to the driver prior to the hearing. They will also mail the driver or his attorney certain documents which are important for the hearing. Our firm also frequently files motions at these hearings, and usually files a list of objections to the proceedings with the hearing officer/judge.

It is important that discovery be obtained through the criminal case prior to the hearing so that your attorney is prepared with all of the police reports, videotapes, audiotapes, documents concerning the breath testing machinery and its maintenance, the officer's field sobriety training manuals, and other documentation so that you get a full and fair hearing and the officer can be properly cross-examined.

IF YOU TOOK THE TEST: At the administrative hearing of a driver who took and failed a test, the driver has the burden to prove (1) that the officer did not have reasonable grounds to believe that the person was operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs; or (2) that they were not arrested or were improperly arrested; or (3) that they were not given the implied consent notice; or (4) that the testing procedure was done incorrectly. Those are the only issues at the hearing and if you can't prove it, you lose your license.

IF YOU REFUSED THE TEST: At the administrative hearing of a person who refused a test, the driver has the burden to prove (1) that the officer did not have reasonable grounds to believe that the person was operating a vehicle while under the influence; or (2) that they were not arrested or were improperly arrested; or (3) they were not given the implied consent notice; or (4) that they did not refuse the test. Those are the only issues at the hearing and if you can't prove it, you lose your license.

IF YOU WERE IN A TRAFFIC ACCIDENT: At the administrative hearing of a person involved in a traffic accident, no matter how minimal the damage was to persons or property, the issues are the same except that if there is any indication that alcohol was involved (even if the driver had a teaspoon of beer), the only issue is whether the implied consent notice was given and whether the test was done properly.

IF YOU WERE UNDER 21 YEARS OF AGE AND TOOK THE TEST: Any person under the age of 21 who operates a motor vehicle with an alcohol concentration of .02 or greater is subject to having his or her driving privileges suspended. The issues at the hearing are the same as those for the over-21's that took the test. If the underage person tested between .02 and .08 the suspension period is 30 days followed by 330 days of restrictions on the first occurrence and a one year suspension on the second. If the underage person tests between a .08 and .149, the suspension period is one year. If the test result is .150 or higher, the license is suspended for one year followed by one year of restriction to only operating a motor vehicle equipped with an ignition interlock device.

OTHER ISSUES OR DEFENSES: Administrative hearings are tough to win because the driver has the burden of proving that he wasn't DUI, whereas in a criminal case it is the prosecutor's burden to prove all elements of a DUI beyond a reasonable doubt. The easiest way to win is if the officer fails to appear. If the police officer doesn't show up to the hearing - case dismissed. Whether a person was even driving may be a defense. Whether a person drank alcohol after driving may be a good defense. There are a multitude of technical statutory or constitutional arguments and defenses. There are also medical defenses (diabetics may often appear intoxicated during a period of insulin deficiency; asthmatics may have a hard time blowing into an Intoxilyzer machine). The list of defenses is only limited to the work and creativity that you and your attorney put into developing a defense for the administrative hearing.

SUSPENSION PENALTIES:
If you fail to meet your burden of proof at the administrative hearing:

  • FIRST TIME TEST FAILURE BETWEEN .08 AND .149: Driving privileges are suspended for 30 days and restricted to driving to and from work, during the course of employment, and to school for 330 days. The reinstatement fee is $100.00.
  • FIRST TIME TEST FAILURE OF .150 OR HIGHER: Driving privileges are suspended for one year followed by one year of restriction to only driving a vehicle equipped with an ignition interlock device.
  • SECOND AND THIRD TEST FAILURE BETWEEN .08 AND .149: Driving privileges are suspended for one year followed by one year of restriction to driving only a motor vehicle equipped with an ignition interlock device. The reinstatement fee is $200.00.
  • SECOND TEST FAILURE OF .150 OR HIGHER: Driving privileges are suspended for one year followed by 2 years of ignition interlock.
  • THIRD TEST FAILURE OF .150 OR HIGHER: Driving privileges are suspended for one year followed by 3 years of ignition interlock.
  • FOURTH TEST FAILURE BETWEEN .08 AND .149: Driving privileges are suspended for one year followed by one year of restriction to driving only a motor vehicle equipped with an ignition interlock device. The reinstatement fee is $300.00.
  • FOURTH TEST FAILURE OF .150 OR HIGHER: Driving privileges are suspended for one year followed by 4 years of ignition interlock.
  • FIFTH TEST FAILURE: Permanent revocation. The license is suspended for the rest of the person's lifetime and there is no provision currently provided in the law for reinstatement.

TEST REFUSAL

  • FIRST TIME REFUSAL: Driving privileges are suspended for one year. The reinstatement fee is $400.00.
  • SECOND TIME REFUSAL: Driving privileges are suspended for two years. The reinstatement fee is $600.00.
  • THIRD TIME REFUSAL: Driving privileges are suspended for three years. The reinstatement fee is $800.00.
  • FOURTH TIME REFUSAL: Driving privileges are suspended for TEN YEARS. The reinstatement fee is $1,000.00.
  • FIFTH TIME REFUSAL: Driving privileges are suspended FOREVER. The license is suspended for the rest of the person's lifetime and there is no provision currently provided in the law for reinstatement.

NOTE: The administrative hearing and the criminal case are two separate suits. Neither one has any bearing whatsoever on the other. However, if you are suspended pursuant to one, that suspension will be run concurrent with a suspension in the other. So, if you lost at the administrative hearing and at trial, and it was your second time DUI, you would only be suspended for one year total. But, your driving record will reflect two separate suspensions for the same arrest.

APPEALING THE SUSPENSION: Every driver has the right to appeal the administrative driver's license suspension to the district court of the county in which the hearing was held. This petition for review must be filed within 10 days or the suspension will stand. If an appeal is taken, the matter is heard anew by a judge and the administrative hearing is treated as though it never happened, except objections at the district court level must have been previously raised at the administrative level or they are deemed waived.  The driver’s privileges will most likely remain valid while the case is pending before the district court. Appealing an administrative hearing is an exceptionally complex task. The Kansas Department of Revenue will assign one of its attorney’s to “defend” against your petition for review and they do little else all day every day than try these cases. They will make it as difficult as possible. These types of appeals require the most experienced and knowledgeable of Kansas DUI attorneys.
Go to next document (Related Offenses)

Go to DUI Guide table of contents

top of page

Kansas & Missouri Legal Resources
DUI Blog Page
DUI DWI Defense
Kansas DUI Guide
Missouri DWI Guide
Free Case Evaluation
Criminal Defense

More DUI DWI & TRAFFIC LAW
Find Your Kansas Municipal or District Court for DUI Cases
Choosing a Kansas DUI Attorney
Choosing a Missouri DWI Lawyer
Missouri DUI versus DWI
Finding a DUI Attorney
Outside of Kansas or Missouri

Help for Substance Abuse

DUI DWI Related Offenses
Kansas Minor in Possesion
Drug Recognition and Zero Tolerance Laws

CRIMINAL DEFENSE
Misdemeanors & Felonies in
State & Municipal Court

Federal Criminal Defense

DOMESTIC LAW
Divorce,Child Custody, Paternity and other Domestic Relations case

PERSONAL INJURY
Includes Medical Malpractice

DOWNLOAD
CLIENT QUESTIONNAIRE

super lawyers 2006

super lawyers 2005

Jursidictions We Frequently
Practice In

Douglas County District
Fairway Municipal
Gardner Municipal
Johnson County District
Kansas City, KS Municipal
Lawrence Municipal
Leawood Municipal
Lenexa Municipal
Merriam Municipal
Miami County District
Mission Municipal
Olathe Municipal
Prairie Village Municipal
Roeland Park Municipal
Shawnee Municipal
Westwood Municipal
Wyandotte County District

This web site is for informational and advertising purposes only. Jay Norton is the attorney responsible for all of the content in the advertising material. The law firm of Erker, Norton, & Hare, L.L.C., is based in Olathe, Kansas. None of the information contained in the Erker, Norton, & Hare, L.L.C. website should be construed as legal advice and it does not create an attorney-client relationship between the viewer and Erker, Norton, & Hare, L.L.C. absent an express agreement between the law firm and the viewer. The attorneys of our firm have extensive experience as Kansas DUI lawyers and Missouri DWI lawyers and are also well known in the community as Kansas criminal defense attorneys, Missouri criminal defense attorneys and federal criminal defense attorneys. The Guide to Kansas DUI Law and Guide to Missouri DWI Law do not constitute legal advice and may or may not accurately represent the current state of the law on those subjects as laws change frequently. Every legal matter is different and the information in these pages may not be applicable to any one specific case. The viewer should neither take nor refrain from taking any action on the basis of any information on this Web site without first seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice. The receipt of an email from our law firm, even in response to a specific question, does not create an attorney-client relationship and no email exchange should be considered confidential. All attorneys at Erker, Norton, & Hare, L.L.C. are licensed in the state of Kansas. Attorneys J. Ryan Hare and Lindsay Hare are licensed in Missouri, as well. None of the information in this Web site pertains to any states other than Kansas and Missouri and should not be construed as solicitation of business in those or any other states. Erker, Norton, & Hare, L.L.C. specifically disclaims any warranties of services this Web site may seem to offer. If you are unclear about the terms of this disclaimer, the accuracy of any information on the website, or if you have a Kansas DUI, Missouri DUI, federal, state or municipal criminal charge in Kansas or Missouri, a personal injury case in Kansas or Missouri, or a domestic relations case in Kansas, please feel free to contact our law firm for further information.
© 2007 Erker, Norton, Hare & Angles, L.L.C. All rights reserved.